According to TMZ, a source at Century 21 claimed Nadya Suleman has shown interest in buying four bedrooms, two and a half bathrooms and a pool at a cost of $1.24 million home in Whittier, Calif. I think she has got her priorities all wrong, 4 bedrooms, one for her then its five kids per room, even with bunk beds that will be a squeeze. Please, please someone lock this nutter up before she can do any more damage, take her children from her and give them a chance.

No wonder the Californian economy is going south, you got to pay for this loony, I feel sorry for you.

Travis was a wild animal, yes he was domesticated and could be safely handles most of the time but at the end of the day he was a wild animal. He should never have been treated the way he was, you would never sleep with a lion or tiger would you, so why sleep with a chimp. Humans have evolved over thousands of years to eat cooked food and to be able to consume wine; these are not found in chimps diets and should not have been given to him – that’s not love its abuse.

I have two parrots a Blue and Gold McCaw and an Eclectus, they are part of the family and surprisingly can be petted much the same way you can with a cat – but at the end of the day they are not cats or dogs, and they need to be treated with respect – and like many pets they need to know the pecking order, I am the boss. Treated with respect they are great pets, but you need to know where the line is.

Chimps, parrots, snakes and other exotic’s are not cats and dogs; they can’t be treated like cats and dogs. They are becoming more popular and I for one am all for licensing them, I am not for stopping people having them as pets but people should be able to show they have a good knowledge of how to look after and be able to handle them safely before being allowed to own them. I would also extend this to certain breeds of dogs as it appears any idiot can get the latest hard man fashion accessory, a Rottweiler, Pit Bull, Bull Terrier or Doberman – these are not suitable family pets just look at the number of children and babies killed and mauled by these dogs.

My only question is – What was he thinking? How is that going to promote a better understanding of his faith, all that is going to do is to reinforce the negative stereotypes.

Apparently it is believed to be an honour killing; personally I can see nothing honourable in killing someone else, especially someone you once loved. If he did do this I hope the bastard rots in jail, and his last days, months, years are truly miserable, as he is a sorry excuse for a human being.

According to the Los Angeles Times Nadya Suleman is creeping out Angelina Jolie, personally I find that hard to believe from the woman who used to wear a vile of Billy Bob Thornton’s blood around her neck. On a creepy scale that sure trumps someone wanting to look like you and Angelina does not have the most traditional of families herself.

According to friends of Miss Sulemans her denials about not having any cosmetic procedures done are garbage, but I will let you decide, I think her lips look a lot thinner and her nose is flatter in this before shot.

Hopefully now the Californian authorities will step in and insure these innocent children are looked after properly as their mother is clearly deluded and unable to look after them herself. How she will be able to earn a living from counseling other people when she is so clearly in need of a considerable amount of counseling herself.

If the Californian authorities can take Britney Spears children from her I see no reason they cannot interfere in this case.

Personally I would find it difficult to cope with 14 healthy children, but according to Nadya Suleman’s publicist – yes you did read that right, PUBLICIST – she already has three disabled children, for which she is in receipt of federal assistance.

Federal assistance – is that not welfare? Well not according to Miss Suleman, neither is the $490.00 she receives each month in food stamps – seams it’s just her God given right. According to her aforementioned publicist one Michael Furtney, Miss Suleman views “the money that she gets from the food stamp program … and the resources disabilities payments she gets for her three children are not welfare. They are part of programs designed to help people with need, and she does not see that as welfare”. The woman is a fruit cake, what else would you call it but welfare, but to give her a chance I looked it up in the Mirriam-Webster Dictionary – guess what I found.  

2a: aid in the form of money or necessities for those in need b: an agency or program through which such aid is distributed

Good news for President Obama though, God obviously works for the welfare department as according to Miss Suleman “I do believe wholeheartedly that God will provide in his own way” – so he is the one dishing out the welfare, that lets the tax payer off the hook then. Perhaps he could help out with the stimulus too, well maybe that’s a step to far.

We have also been lead to believe that all is well at home and that Mom, Pop and the kids are all one big happy family. Not according to Miss Suleman’s mother “Her dad and I were talking to her doctor so he would not do this again. He did promise and he kept his promise. However she went somewhere else and had this last in vitro done again which resulted in octuplets.” – not such happy families, and I am sure she said that she used the same doctor for all her treatments?

Her publicist said that she has had several nannies already – where from and who is paying for them? Anyhow I thought she said that she was doing it all by herself, sorry forgot she has God on her side, which is a good thing – otherwise how could she have afforded to visit the West Coast IVF Clinic in Beverly Hills. I know IVF is expensive but Beverly Hills IVF that has to be seriously expensive – Where did she get the money from? Have the FBI checked the unsolved bank raids? God does as they say move in mysterious ways and in the case of Miss Suleman very mysterious ways.  

If you agree with the following please follow the link to – No Stimulus – and make your voice heard.

“Congress should not enact an expensive spending bill under the pretence of stimulus or recovery. We cannot spend our way to prosperity, and such an expansion of the federal government will put a crushing burden on taxpayers in the long-term.”

The vote may have been passed in both the House and the Senate, but the fight is not over, the bill will now go to a conference committee who will work out the differences between the two bills to come up with one bill, which will again have to be voted on by both houses.

If you want the Pork cut you need to sign the petition, why should the tax payer pay to bailout special interest groups. Do you want your children and grandchildren to be paying for this, reckless course of action?

Let’s not forget how we got in the mess to start with, TOO MUCH DEBT, what is this bill, MORE DEBT.

More Debt for you! More Debt for your children! More Debt for your grandchildren!

President Obama has been in office for little over three weeks and already he has tried to enter the White House through a window, and yesterday he banged his head on Marine One – let the O’Bumbles commence.

I’m sorry, that’s a window Mr. President!

Ouch, that’s going to smart!